|
January-March 2005
|
Purgatorius magazine |
|
Knowledge Is Power
Many Americans have become disillusioned with our political system. We vote for the lesser of two evils, often without knowing what Evil Jr. really stands for. We need to arm ourselves with knowledge to combat the failings of our system. One way to do this is to start a scientific information movement, compiling relevant, impartial science in a nonpartisan journal that could be a trusted source for all voters a scientific voter’s guide. Imagine a world where our politicians actually responded to our desires, instead of telling us one thing and doing another, or trying to convince us we want something else. According to polls, most Americans want the following:
Even if we don’t all agree that the above policies are right for Americans, I think the vast majority of us can agree about some basic rights that ought to be shared by everyone (adapted from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1994 Draft Declaration of Principles on Human Rights and the Environment):
While we have made great gains in a number of these areas in the past fifty years, there are also significant failures, and there is room for vast improvement.
These ongoing problems might not make it into the news as much as the Scott Peterson trial, but we should all be aware of them. So why haven’t we overcome some of these major problems? It’s what we the people want. Why isn’t our government getting the job done? These questions aren’t easily answered, but there are a number of contributing, interconnected factors. Our political system is set up in a way that makes money the prime motivator. Political candidates need money to communicate with the populace via advertising. Election expenditures were $1.6 billion for television advertising alone in 2004. The money candidates raise comes overwhelmingly from corporations, labor unions, special interest groups, and wealthy individuals. As of 2000, less than 5% of Americans contributed anything in individual campaign contributions, and less than 0.25% contributed over $200. If money talks, 95% of Americans say nothing. The more money you have, the more free speech you get. In other words, speech isn’t free anymore. Politicians have become increasingly beholden to their sponsors, often formulating policy with them and appointing them to positions of power. A disturbing number of former industry lobbyists and representatives go on to positions where they are supposed to be regulating their former industries. Then when politicians have to answer to the American people, they must use spin, bluster, and disinformation to hide the fact that they haven’t really been addressing our needs. Politicians have been reduced to mountebanks, selling snake oil to the masses. The media tend to go along for the ride, content to rake in advertising dollars while oversimplifying and reporting on events devoid of substance (such as who’s ahead in the polls, candidate personalities, controversy, and issues surrounding the campaign), while neglecting the more static issues (policies, platforms, plans). It is possible for a majority of the people to be wrong, especially when information and facts have been neglected as less than newsworthy. Politicians and the complacent media have made it hard for the American people to understand what’s going on. People don’t have the time to try and decipher all the poor information we’re fed. But we are also culpable in letting ourselves be duped. We have a responsibility to try and understand what’s become of our government, and to make our voices heard. The problem of money in politics, and the misinformation and misrepresentation that it buys, can and is being attacked on a number of fronts. Campaign finance reform remains high on the agenda for Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) putting more muscle into the existing regulations, and pushing for further reform to close loopholes. Former presidents Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford are part of an effort to push for free airtime for qualifying candidates in the months leading up to an election. A number of websites disclose candidates’ funding sources. There are also nonpartisan websites disseminating information about candidates and issues. These are all important steps for working toward more responsive government. Without reliable information about our politicians and their agendas, it is difficult to make good decisions about who and what to vote for. The information generally exists, but most people don’t have the time or resources to track it down. There ought to be a source for consistently reliable and comprehensive information about politics. Project Vote Smart is a nonpartisan website that presents some information about political candidates, but would benefit from more in-depth analysis of issues. This could be provided by an interdisciplinary journal that summarizes issues with political significance from peer-reviewed journals covering everything from economics to ecology to sociology to medicine to foreign policy. So, for example, a research article from the journal Oikos, examining the effectiveness of the Healthy Forests Initiative, might be summarized in the same issue as a study in Economic Issues projecting the effects of privatizing social security. If the journal developed a reputation as a fair source of political information, its findings might be reported in the popular media. Findings could also be distilled and disseminated via a website like Project Vote Smart’s. Additionally, prior to elections, the journal could publish a guide with a comprehensive review of past issues to aid voters in making a decision. With enough resources, this could also be distributed to all registered voters. Armed with this knowledge about what our politicians and candidates are really up to - about what their platforms might really accomplish for the good of our society - more of us will be inclined to choose better representatives. And in turn, the pool of good, honest candidates will deepen, responding to our desire. A scientific voter's guide won’t solve all the problems with our current system, but could empower enough people with the knowledge to help keep our government from becoming more of the farce or tragedy that James Madison feared.
Useful resources and linksCampaign FinanceCampaign Finance Guide: http://www.campaignfinanceguide.org/ Russ Feingold on Campaign Finance Reform: http://www.russfeingold.org/cfr.php The Reform Institute: http://reforminstitute.org/index.shtml Campaign Finance Institute: http://www.cfinst.org/ IssuesProject Vote Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/ Issues Pro & Con: http://www.issuesprocon.org/ Almanac of Policy Issues: http://www.policyalmanac.org/ Legislative Histories: http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/legishis.html Free Airtime for CandidatesAlliance for Better Campaigns: http://www.bettercampaigns.org/ Common Cause: http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=192076 Funding SourcesCenter for Responsive Politics: http://www.opensecrets.org/index.asp Political Money Line: http://www.fecinfo.com/ Follow the Money: http://www.followthemoney.org/ Other ResourcesThe Center for Public Integrity: http://www.publicintegrity.org/default.aspx The Center for Voting and Democracy: http://www.fairvote.org/index.html Political Search Engine: http://www.politicalinformation.com/ Washington Votes: http://www.washingtonvotes.org/ Universal Declaration of Human Rights: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html 1994 Draft Declaration of Principles on Human Rights and the Environment: http://www.worldpolicy.org/globalrights/environment/envright.html
[i] ABC/Washington Post Poll, Jan 30-Feb 1, 2003 [ii] Money Magazine Poll, 2004 [iii] Kaiser Health Poll Report, Jan-Feb, 2003 [iv] ABC/Washington Post Poll, Mar 30-Apr 2, 2000 [v] Times Mirror Center for The People & The Press, Jul 1994 (Completely Agree 46%, Mostly Agree 36%) [vi] Greenberg/Quinlan Poll, 2001 [vii] Zogby International Poll, “Americans and the World Around Them,” Aug 2004 |
||||